Seacrh engines ought not bring many results from one writer

 I have written a lot to the internet, almost solely blogs plus made my books available, and earlier made videos. I have some problems of people, especially women attacking in my life as if they wanted to erase my kinds of people. It appears they made siome internet search or subscribed my blog posts in some way, so that they think I get much too much publicity on their computer. They appear people interested in social information so that they would have chosen to receive all of my posts or the like, and since I am an internet writer, they get too much post from my blogs. It appears also that they get much too much my blogs in their search results, 1% of which already could be too much since they are different type of people with different values and different social style/ways than I. So in such ordered posting or search es based on search history there should be some information about on which reason they receive the posts and how many they receive them in a week, a month or so, and how to choose a better more common sense like amount of my posts, like for example nio posts or once a month.

Hienoja aiheita

 Mietin tässä, kun villakoirani blogissa on ainakin viime aikoina ollut hienoja aiheita, mm oodi sille ja lastenkirjayritelmä sekä susihukkanen, että villakoirani banjo on itse hienoista aiheista harrastunut, ja niin sen ympäristö tuottaa vähän jotain samalta suunnalta, ja niistä sitten koostuu tuo anti. Se harrastelee luontoa ja taidetta, on kiinnostunut sanomalehden näkemyksellisistä jutuista sekä susista yms kertovista luontoaiheista lehdessä. Niin sitten, kun jokin hyvä aihe tulee vastaan, niin sen aika usein osaa täydentää ihan hyväksi blogikirjoitukseksi, jos poimii siitä onnistuneen eiköä yritä kaavan mukaan aina samaa. Esim. kun se näki viime viikolla jokin aamuyö unta lastenkirjasta, niin kiinnitin huomiota siihen, miten hienoja vesivärikuvia villakoirista (itsestään) se oli siihen ajatellut, mutta kun en osannut niitö maalata, niin otin jonkun kivan kúvan, ja vain yhden, kun ei sen nukkuma-aikana ollut niin montaa aihetta, ja kirjasin ylös sen näkemyksen kirjan tekstistä. Ja susihukkanen sitten sen tapaan harrasteli aihetta, luulen, ja niin tuliu lisäys sudesta.

Writing a good blog

My poodle Banjo said that he would like to start an English blog, and star with a Christmas greeting and as a present the blog. The greeting would say something like: "Banjo the Poodle wishes a Good Christmas and a Happy new Year 2021!" and have a picture of Banjo with a Christmas flower. 

I said that the blog ought to have just best pieces of how Banjo has been on an adventure in my other blogs, and not just try to write a blog and write a blog, etc, since such is work like and does not give the writer any hint of how to write. Instead I ought to need highlights, atmospheres, sources of joy, insights, wisdom of life, smnall tales, and good pictures of nature, pets, home life or the like. 

Writers and artists do not need all possible feedback

 I am a writer. I write teaching material to the inetrnet around the subject rationality of feelings. I mostly know the subject very well, while others typically do not have skills in just the rationality of feelings. So mostly I think that if the readers discuss the subject with some poepl they know, they just learn to think it through better, and maybe spread the interest to such, but it isn't any skilled comment to my text and not so eager either I guess. So mostly I am without feedback and that is good so. 

I have also composed some short melodies. In being a composer the same phenomenom is even much clearer: The melodies are from my own experriuence of liufe which I usually remember well, while those who have seen the note mostly do not know so well what kind of experiuence it was. And if they hear someone playing it, maybe they played it in a different way and so even the subject of the melody was not communicated. So I think that often composers do not need any feedback. But of course skilled people who understand about composing, music, wisdom of life, the areas if life composed about, etc werll, they could give some feedback, talk a little, but I guess that otherwise it isnät needed, but one ought to know how widely spread the music is and who playes it to which large groups and dud they like it.

* * *

16th of December 2020   Quite often good quality pieces of art and even texts are placed somehow higher than the readers. In a sense that is of course so: as an artist or a writer or a thinker the readers etc maybe couldn't produce as good quality. But on the other hand, good quality demands that the subject would ber all-human and well communicated, well taught, found in the everyday lives of the readers or have some common major happening. So in a sense the text, sonbg or whatever it is lifts the readers to quite much the same level as the piece of art or text, teaches it to the readers, listeners or the like, and so the full effect, the major task of the work as largely at the same level as the readers, which may be higher skill etc than the usual of the readers yused tyo be.

Original recordings

I watched some half of a youtube.com video of Peking some hundred years ago. It tasted like life, so it could have been among the first filmed things. There were available also other youtube videos from some time later years but those looked like as if the people in them  were either actors or had watched the original film and wanted to take part in such, so that it no longer was a documentary of ordinary life to make people's pictures of the world better and to teach about life.
Years ago I heard one of the first recordings of music and it was just like a dream, charming, not self-conscious, like the later recordings were always listening to what kind of sound they now produce via the equipment. It was just sang for the beauty and enjoyment of music.
I guess that the internet is somewhat overcoming that problem of lower quality, since in it those interested in appearing in recordings get widely the chance for that and some audience too. That is like a performance of some kind, searching for something fine, like looks, enjoyment, high skills, interesting things to offer. So in a sense it has become a matter of skill or of enthusiasm.
Documents on the other hand are a different kind of thing. Instead of appearing skiulled and offering view to something dream like, they tell about life in practice, which is a more well working ground for the audience to build upon.
The cahrm of a recording like an original recording comes from it giving room to things themselves. Instead of filming just about everything that appears to have a chance of success in the media, having manyfold amount of those things in one's life, having them in a spirited way, with skills and life skills backing themup, and using only tiny fraction of what appears to be good enough quality, so that the recording is just some glimpse of some richness of life and some areas of life of which there is lot to offer in practice for a wide group of people, and preferably for animals too since pets can rise some quality and skill and enthusiasm, some liked things to higher, more magnifient looking level, ordinary pets that is, not overused.

About the 'do's and 'don't's of internet writing

In the internet, at least if you write in English, teh possible audience is much wider than in ordinary writing, and often it happens that you do not quite know which groups read youir texts and it may be that some read who are not up to the basic starting level common in your own country which your texts need. So if you advertise something like this is fine to have this, there maybe are masses of foreigners coming and taking it away since they do not understand the viewpoint from which it is needed and why it ought to be just like that and how to keep it up even if one is motivated. And so instead of telling of things you should tell of what kinds of things you can build such upon all over the world and what is their usefulness in whatever climate, culture and place it is. And in this refer to common internetional cultural traits likeciviliced wisdom, rationality, shops, free time, friends etc, knowing that there can be lots of variation in these among your readers. I think it is also often good to include links that teach/introduce the things mentioned and needed in your text, so that in an entirely different kind of place a like-minded can have such a hobby too.

My own text that I have somehow got stuck writing now for almost two years, I guess that it interests people abroad: http://learntalents.blogspot.com . 

 * * *

14th of September 2020   In writing or posting material to the internet, it matters that you yourself create good quality material that is interesting as widely as you offer it. There are also other reasons than quality for other people to be in the internet, since they may be for example interesting persons for some group. Also one sometimes estimates wrong to which group some material is aimed, so that one's view of quality criterions may go ashtray if one compares too much to others. Good quality material like for example soma joy of life that is common to many, like some summer time photografs, is a joy to both the viewer and the author and gives better position for the author than posting too much material and so of lower quality too on the average.

 

Hakujen tekemisestä

Olen kirjoittanut montaa blogia, mutten oikein itse osaa tehdä internethakuja. Näyttää siltä, että jonkin asian harrastaja, kannattaja ei löydä paljoakaan tietoa ym sisältöä, mutta aiheesta tietämätön tai vastustaja löytää sitä sun tätä. Voiko olla, ettei hakukone oikeasti, tietosanakirjaa lukuunottamatta, ole tiedonhaun väline, vaan internetissä on sitä sun tätä materiaalia, muttei järjestelmällisesti ainakaan  edistyneille, ja niin jos on harrastunut jostakin aiheesta, niin löytää sitä sun tätä kivaa muttei juuri samasta aiheesta, esim. äsken tein urheiluaiheisen haun ja löysin kuvan, jossa jalkapalloa pelaavat näyttävät mallia mediassa toimimisesta, sekä laukkakilpailuvideon.