I have been an internet writer for over 20 years. That is in publicity without being in the newspapers, magazines, tv or radio, or books or CDs.
In school pupils get used to reading fact texts and learn basic skills about such.
It is typical that what one produces does not interest others much. So one does not get any fans. Those in the media who have fans are unusual and in the media because their input is liked and valued.
If one is in sight without being interedting, afyer some amiunt others want to shut you down, espwcially enemies want to get rid your sight.
In the meduas some also wsnt to get your place, so it is worth advertising if you use a free internet site, etc. Like my blogs are st the free www.blogger.com blog site, and videos at the free video site www.youtube.com .
Generally one does not get any feedback about texts, some just read it and got some kind of impression of it but were not so i terested init. Very many people read really lot every day.
Beung in the media does not make one happy, quite opposite. Typically one has some skill or other strong good side that many people want to learn and that is why one is in the media. But most do not learn it fullt, so that one gets as feedback a severe lowering of one's skills and quality of life. Except when one got classified right and got no feedback, so that one can enjoy lufe with one's own skills. The audience isn't equal with one's skills, but instead like young kuds comoared with an adult, so that even their teacher is harmfully low in skills.
Politicians need to be liked a lit. Otherwise thete is too much fighting and sabotage. So one cannot put to politics people who only have somethi g to say.
If you sre in publicity, most people pay attention to whst you are like and wonder if you could be attacked or made some cunning plans against you or to interfere a lit with your lufe. So it is not wise to be in publicity about social matters or your personal characteridtics, except if you can bear such sttention with it's consequences.
Often people from other conyinents and otherwise from very fifferent kinds of culyural groups msy react really weird.
The basic advice is to treat people who hsve been in the publicity according to justice and responbly & according to common sense, like with a peace activist you might discus their views on peace but not attsck because of softness, and a dog lover of certain breed would attract lovers of tge same breed and not people wanting to replace dogs with cats. So it is a matter of finding your own groip instead of consuming everything and taking it personally that they are not your favoyrites. Generally I have the impression thst the internet needs much more such tuning.
